🔗 Share this article

Per a new examination, numerous of individuals having backgrounds in the fossil fuel industry have been placed within the present leadership, comprising more than 40 who previously been employed directly for coal corporations.

Overview of the Report

The study analyzed the backgrounds of nominees and officials working in the administration and multiple federal agencies overseeing energy matters. These include key organizations like the EPA, the Department of the Interior, and the energy office.

Broader Policy Climate

The analysis comes while ongoing efforts to roll back environmental policies and clean energy programs. For example, new bills have opened extensive sections of public property for extraction and eliminated funding for sustainable sources.

With the flood of bad actions that have transpired on the environment side... it’s important to educate the public that these aren’t just steps from the nebulous, massive thing that is the government generally, said a analyst engaged in the study. They are frequently individual actors coming from specific powerful groups that are executing this harmful pro-industry plan.

Key Results

Analysts found 111 employees whom they considered as fossil fuel insiders and clean energy critics. That includes 43 individuals who were previously employed by gas firms. Included in them are well-known leading executives including the energy secretary, who earlier worked as chief executive of a oil extraction company.

This roster furthermore includes lower-profile administration personnel. As an illustration, the department responsible for renewable energy is managed by a ex- fracking manager. Similarly, a high-level energy consultant in the White House has occupied senior positions at large petroleum companies.

Additional Connections

Another 12 personnel possess ties to fossil fuel-funded conservative thinktanks. Those cover former employees and fellows of groups that have strongly resisted clean power and promoted the use of traditional energy.

A total of 29 further appointees are previous industry managers from polluting industries whose business interests are intimately linked to oil and gas. Additional personnel have relationships with utility companies that distribute conventional power or elected representatives who have supported pro-coal initiatives.

Agency Emphasis

Analysts found that 32 staff at the Interior Department by themselves have ties to fossil fuel industries, rendering it the highest influenced national body. That encompasses the leader of the department, who has long accepted oil funding and served as a link between fossil fuel business donors and the government.

Campaign Funding

Fossil fuel donors contributed sizable funds to the presidential effort and swearing-in. Since entering the White House, the government has not only established pro-fossil fuel rules but also designed benefits and exceptions that advantage the field.

Qualifications Issues

Alongside energy-connected candidates, the researchers noted a number of administration leaders who were nominated to powerful jobs with minimal or no relevant expertise.

These individuals may not be connected to fossil fuels so closely, but their unfamiliarity is dangerous, stated a analyst. It is logical to think they will be easily influenced, or easy marks, for the energy sector’s agenda.

As an example, the nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency’s department of general counsel has limited litigation history, having not ever handled a lawsuit to completion, never taken a deposition, and not argued a court petition.

In an additional case, a executive advisor focusing on regulatory issues came to the position after serving in jobs separate to the industry, with no obvious relevant sector or regulatory background.

Administration Reaction

A official for the executive branch criticized the analysis, stating that the leadership’s personnel are extremely capable to execute on the people’s instruction to expand domestic resource output.

Historical and Present Context

The administration oversaw a substantial number of deregulatory measures during its initial term. During its current period, prepared with conservative blueprints, it has initiated a far more extensive and harsher crackdown on climate regulations and alternative sources.

There is no embarrassment, stated one expert. Officials are willing and prepared to go out there and promote the fact that they are doing benefits for the fossil fuel industry, resource field, the mining business.